by Dr. Fred
Many may (wrongly) believe that the modern mention of a "new world order" from George Bush Sr., in 1991 was where the idea of such a thing got its start. They couldn't be more wrong.
The idea of the "new world order" (NWO) goes back a ways, nearly to the beginning of the 1900s. Since that time there have been many references and calls for it among authors, statesmen, presidents, and politicians alike. It is simply not a new idea, but something that has been talked about in earnest for more than 100 years.
More than one person has compiled a listing of uses of the term "new world order" going back as far as 1915 and one in particular has titled his listing "New World Order - Fact or Fiction?"
For anyone who has studied the subject of the NWO, it becomes clear that many of the names associated with the pushing of that agenda are all connected in one way or another. Most are socialists, while some are Communists. Some of the names are well-known to most while some names are a bit of a surprise.
Let's go back to 1915 and start with Nicholas Murray Butler, then president of Columbia University. He was also connected to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and on November 27, 1915 delivered a speech in Philadelphia titled, "A New World Order is Being Born." In it, he is quoted as saying the following:
The old world order changed when this war storm broke--the old world order died with the setting of the day's sun and a New World Order is being born while I speak.
I'm quite sure that the average person hearing these words really had little clue as to their full import. Butler spoke of an old world order that had died with a previous war and a new beginning, a new order has risen from it. Yet, only a few years later, WWI took place, which was supposedly the war to end all wars. Not so.
There are many ways to take that and it is clear that the ambiguous nature of his words were left to be taken by each individual as they understood them. This is still the way the left does things today, even with such a simple phrase such as "Change is Coming!" used by then candidate Barack Obama leading up to the presidential election in 2007. What Mr. Obama meant by that phrase and the way many people understood it were obviously two different things.
Since Butler's speech, there have been many individuals who have continued to push the process of building the NWO. In 1918, Charles R. Van Hise, president of the University of Wisconsin addressed the Wisconsin State Convention of the League to Enforce Peace with a speech titled, "The Foundation of a New World Order." During that speech, he spoke of the world becoming one and all must act together through "formal treaty covenants."
Those who stand resolutely in the shadows pulling the strings as it were toward a NWO always use the concept of world peace as the pivot point. Who doesn't want peace, right?
The trouble is that these same globalists who seek and push toward the NWO they envision have used war many times to create the need for peace through disarmament and treaties. This is pure Hegelian Dialectic, as we've discussed before.
The globalists use war to bring home the point that peace is so desperately needed. Of course, the fact that they create and/or back both sides of the combatants in most if not all wars simply points to the fact that without the globalists creating so many wars, the world might have a great chance for peace. But the globalists do not want the people of the world to realize that peace is possible without them. They portray themselves as partners with peace and only they are truly capable of bringing world peace to fruition.
Of course, for that to happen, it will need to be done their way and that means ultimately that the United Nations (UN) will become the world's police force and military at the same time. The UN will also have sovereignty over all "nations," but of course, in the NWO there really will be no need for individual states or nations, will there? All of this is to suit the desires of the globalists.
Other references to the coming NWO were made in 1919 and I find one in particular very interesting. Please read this next bit of information very carefully.
A book entitled The New World Order by Samuel Zane Batten is published by the American Baptist Publication Society. In this book, Batten declares: 'The old order passes from view, the new world rises upon our vision...We have vindicated the right of social control...There must be developed a national spirit of service...Society must break the stranglehold of capitalism...The natural resources of the nation must be socialized...The state must socialize every group...Men must learn to have a world patriotism. World patriotism must be a faith...There is no more justice for the claim of absolute sovereignty on the part of a nation than on the part of an individual...The only alternative is World Federation...with a world parliament, and international court, and an international police force...Men must have an international mind before there can be a world federation'."
Zane was a Baptist minister who in 1919 already believed that a World Federation was far superior to individual states or nations. I find it fascinating that whether he was advocating such a view due his religious principles or because of a devout belief in a secular NWO, the truth remains that he did a great service for the globalists.
Most also know that H.G. Wells - a Fabian Socialist - wrote several books dealing with aspects of the NWO. One in particular, The Open Consipracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution stated, "The political world of the Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments...The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms, it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of New York..." Another of Wells' books - The New World Order - decried the "system of nationalist individualism..."
As we continue through history to the present, we find many names associated with the Council on Foreign Affairs (CFR; Zbigniew Brzezinski), the Trilateral Commission, UNESCO, the United Nations World magazine, and even newspapers like The Chicago Tribune and others. The globalists have been bound and determined to bring this entire world to the point of it being a one-world system that ultimately provides them with unlimited power to do whatever they like.
The NWO has one particular principle that is highly lauded by globalists the world over. Under the NWO, a completely controlled society exists. The population of each region of the world comes under the same policies of socialism. In essence, this is one of the big reasons why I believe Islam is being allowed to grow and prosper virtually unchecked throughout the world. Islam also is a system wherein all people within that system are fully controlled. As ISIS moves throughout the Middle East, what are they doing besides simply conquering areas? They are dominating people, killing those whom they believe will not acquiesce to their system and forcing the rest to do whatever is considered to be Sharia law.
There will come a time when Islam will no longer be needed and globalists will seek to stamp it out, but that will only come once the globalists have their NWO fully in place and they control the world.
We hear talk of the UN granted world powers over all national military units and we cringe to say the least. Yet, in 1951, The Chicago Tribune published an article on their front page titled "Global Flag Gen. Ike's Aim, Says Senator." The article stated, "Gen. Eisenhower is working for an allied army under a single flag, uniform, and command to defend Western Europe, senators reported today on their return from an overseas inspection trip."
That allied army under a single flag, etc., would come under the authority of the UN, not the United States. It is clear then that even then - during the 1950s - when people were inspired by and respected Eisenhower, he was already working to subvert the United States' military.
In 1961 JFK was even part of the movement toward a NWO. "President Kennedy delivers [State Department document 7277 titled, "Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete disarmament in a Peaceful World] to the UN on Sept 25. This document provides that the United States will disarm along with other countries so that the UN becomes the unchallengeable World power....disarmament "would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force."
In 1968, then Governor of New York Nelson Rockefeller essentially promised that if he was elected president he would work toward a NWO internationally.
I could go on and on but I think you get the idea. This world has been moving toward a New World Order for quite some time and while we might be able to slow it down here and there, it is my belief that we will arrive to the point of a one-world system in the not too distant future. The Bible predicts it and that's all I need.
Are you prepared for what lies ahead?
(This article has been reblogged from For Truth's Sake!)
No comments:
Post a Comment