Ultimate Gameplan: Obama Defers to United Nations to Remove America’s Sovereignty

by Dr. Fred

Click to enlarge

President Obama defers to United Nations far too often and that can be easily proven. In one report submitted to the UN, the United States' State Department included Arizona as a state that violates human rights. 

At the time the report was submitted, the Department of Justice under Eric Holder was in the process of suing Arizona for their immigration laws that were keeping illegal aliens out of that state.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton included the dispute in the report because she thought the U.S. could serve as "a model" to other nations.

In other words, this was intended to embarrass the Governor of Arizona - Jan Brewer - simply because she is a Republican. Do we believe that the same lawsuit would have occurred had the governor been Democrat? At the same time, too many Democrats play fast and loose with American constitutional law and because of that, would have been likely very willing to set aside laws in favor of allowing illegal aliens the "right" to immigrate to the US.

In spite of the fact that according to Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, the Federal Government is tasked with stopping "invasions" to our shores from foreign countries, it refuses to uphold that law, leaving it to the individual states to deal with it. But when those states try to deal with it, Holder's DOJ sues to stop them, in essence admitting that it is the Federal Government's responsibility.

In another incident where the UN was given power and authority over America, back during the elections of November 2012, the UN was invited by the Obama administration to monitor US polling stations. Neil Cavuto reported on the situation then.

The group is affiliated with the United Nations. It's called the Organization for Security and Cooperation. And it's been monitoring United States elections for the better part of a decade now, but this time around, liberal activists are coordinating with these guys to watch for any hint of voter suppression by conservatives.

Here, we see that conservatives are seen as the bad guys, the guys who apparently are willing to do anything to keep - in that case - Mr. Obama from being re-elected. This is in spite of the fact that many voter fraud cases have come to the surface since that election took place and nearly all of them were precipitated by Democrats, not Republicans. Some were brazen enough to brag about it on their social network page, as in the case of Jim Turner of Chapel Hill, NC, who bragged he had already voted for Obama five times in one day and would again. Turns out that Mr. Turner is also in charge of voter registration in his area.

While UN reps were busy watching for any problems caused by conservatives, apparently, no one cared about people like Jim Turner. Why is that? Can you guess?

Of course, my recent article on Ferguson, MO also shows that the UN is being deferred to by the Obama Administration. Recall that Mr. Obama also grouped three things together as if they were all illegal, when only two of them were illegal: looting, carrying guns, and attacking the police. Carrying guns in Missouri is not illegal activity and many business owners used them as a show of force to dissuade looters from destroying their businesses. It worked well.

But of course, the UN called for in-depth investigation of the Trayvon Martin shooting as well as doing the same for the Ferguson, MO situation in which an officer - who received a severe eye socket injury from assailant Mike Brown - shot and killed Brown as he apparently rushed toward him.

The UN is using what appear to be racially motivated situations here in America to cite human rights violations. However, they ignore the black on white crime that is so prevalent. The UN is doing the same thing in South Africa where blacks continue to slaughter white farmers (boers). It is a one-sided tragedy used to fulfill a specific agenda where "white privilege" is used to allow racism toward whites to exist.

We also know that China and other countries have called for the elimination of America's 2nd Amendment in spite of their own set of human rights violations. More countries are attempting to give the UN more power and authority over their own national sovereignty and I fully believe the Obama defers to United Nations often and wants nothing more than to be able to give the United States to the UN, which will destroy America's sovereignty.

When that happens, we can kiss the Constitution officially good-bye.

(This article has been reblogged from For Truth's Sake!)

NAACP Doesn’t Care If Dorian Johnson Lied About Mike Brown Attack

by Dr. Fred

Truth? What is truth?

Why allow the truth to actually stop your agenda? Dorian Johnson lied, according to The Viper radio station, but it would appear that no one cares, especially the NAACP.

Johnson himself has a problematic past where he has crossed paths with the police and the court system. In 2011, "Johnson was charged with a misdemeanor after giving police a false first name after he was arrested on suspicion of theft. He later pleaded guilty."

By giving a false name to police (and also telling them he was only 16 when he was actually 19), means that Dorian Johnson lied to them. Now it turns out that he may also have deliberately lied about the incident in which Mike Brown lost his life.

Adolphus Pruitt, president of the St. Louis NAACP chapter, which has been encouraging witnesses to come forward, said Johnson’s false report case “doesn’t concern me.”

Sure, why would it? Obviously, Pruitt isn't interested in truth. He's simply interested in his own agenda. This is part of the false narrative that continues to prop up the notion that whites are going after blacks at unprecedented levels here in America.

Of course, what folks like Pruitt (and many others within the liberal arena, including the news media) fail to admit is that there is more black on black crime happening in places like Chicago and Oakland than anything. In fact, there are too many weekly instances of black on white crimes occurring throughout America, but when these situations are reported, the media prefers to leave out things like the race of the individual perpetrators involved. However, if the perpetrator is white and has committed a crime against a black person, the media has no difficulty in announcing the race of those involved.

Dorian Johnson lied and few seem to care.

As I have said before, it is becoming more clear that someone is trying to paint a picture of America that is completely inaccurate. The desired outcome is to show that South African-like "apartheid" exists in America and something needs to be done about it. That may involve the United Nations.

I've already written two articles on this subject and I continue to emphasize it because I believe it is that important. You can read those articles here and here.

If it is true that things are being prepped to allow the UN to come into America, remove some of our sovereignty by being forced into deferring to the UN's guidelines and mandates, then we can only conclude that we are moving toward a time when all of America will come under the auspices of the UN's authority.

It is very clear that even if/when the truth comes out that exonerates Officer Wilson (if that is the case), few from the black and liberal communities will hear it. They will simply argue that there is enough "police brutality against people of color" and "white on black crime" in America that needs attention.

Those who stand up to oppose such idiocy will be shouted down, ridiculed, castigated, and ostracized by the rest. This is all the reactionary stance of people who are steeped in political correctness (Cultural Marxism). Political Correctness turns on emotional virtue. It has nothing to do with absolute truth, but the way people can be made to feel.

Years ago, people were more willing and able to use critical thinking skills. Since that time, the schools have done whatever possible to eradicate that from young people's arsenals. Those in leadership do not want people to think critically. They want the population to be moved by emotion, not rational thinking.

This is exactly what we have today in many parts of America's black communities. They have been taught for so long that they are powder kegs ready to go off that it is expected that they respond by looting, rioting, and worse when a situation occurs like the one with Mike Brown.

Eventually, it will get so bad in pockets of America that the UN will be "forced" to enter the picture and direct things. Once that happens, we will begin to see a greater push to eliminate the 2nd Amendment and the 1st. The focus will be on "healing" that needs to occur in America and this can best be done - we will be told - by putting away our weapons and watching what we say. That's the start of it.

Eventually, the UN will be granted more and more authority over America and it's all because race-baiters have been working hard as liars and provocateurs throughout America's black communities. It's terribly tragic but this is the liberal agenda and it's been working very well for them.

The only problem of course is that one day, people will wake up to realize everything they've been told about the coming Utopian enterprise is all a lie. By then, it'll be way too late. The time for action is now.

(This article has been reblogged from For Truth's Sake!)

Should You Buy Gold or Silver in Preparation for the Coming Collapse?

by Dr. Fred

Should you buy gold or silver? I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but I firmly believe America is on a one-way, unavoidable path to economic collapse, made completely possible by "progressive" ideologies that have warped the rule of law into something unrecognizable. It may be necessary to buy gold or silver. Of course people are completely free to reject my opinion and we'll simply see what happens over the next few years. It seems unmistakable to me. Though I fully hope that I'm 100% wrong, I doubt it and I did not arrive at this conclusion easily. It was only after a great deal of research from articles and books written by economists and strategists that I came to this conclusion. I also used the Bible as a guide as well, though the Bible does not pinpoint the times necessarily in all things.

For the longest time, I've been hearing that people should buy gold and silver to ensure the security of their lives against this coming collapse. Many people thought to buy gold or silver (or even both), but in my opinion, they may have done it the wrong way. Many (far too many) have purchased gold certificates. Either that or they have purchased a large chunk of gold that is stored somewhere where they really can't reach it, like in Zurich. What good will that be if/when the bottom completely falls out of the American economy?

I would never invest in that type of gold or silver. Even if you actually have it in your possession, how would you go about breaking it into smaller "denominations"? Without a very hot furnace, it's difficult. Isn't it better to have what they call "junk silver" or gold coins?

What is called "junk silver" today is nothing more than the old coins that were minted using mostly pure silver. You remember them from the "olden" days. These coins have a face value (twenty-five cents, fifty cents, etc.), but they also have a silver "spot" value, which constantly fluctuates. As I write this, the spot price of silver is $19.24/oz while the spot price of gold is $1261.00/oz. Both values were higher yesterday.

When I was in 8th grade, I actually recall the spot price of gold being $35.00/oz. It's obviously gone up but numerous people who deal with gold and silver will say that even these spot prices are artificially "fixed," meaning the real value of silver/gold is far greater but the values are being artificially kept low. However, once the American economy collapses (and it will), we will see the true value of silver and gold at that point.

The way it works is very simple. If you buy "junk silver," you will pay the current spot price. If you bought it today, you would pay the $19.24/oz. What that means is you might pay a few thousand dollars for a baggie filled with silver coins. When the economy collapses, you will have - at the very least - the face value of the coins and very possibly, far more in actual worth. However, this will have to be balanced with the price of goods and services at that time as well.

We all know that groceries are not getting any cheaper. In fact, they continue to rise at our local grocery stores every week. It's good to stock up on the things that won't go bad or spoil and it's probably a good idea to have some of those freeze-dried foods in a can as well. Other things like toilet paper, water, and other necessities are worth stocking up on too.

When the economy collapses, how would you be able to use these "junk" silver coins? As one person explained to me, a silver dime (face value = ten cents) might exchange for one loaf of bread. Folks, we are talking about hyper-inflation here and it's not beyond the realm of possibility, especially with the Quantitative Easing that is in place now that will end.

Obviously, when the economy collapses, people will also use a bartering system to get what they need and there's nothing wrong with that. Some individuals already do that now.

What about gold? Are there "junk" gold coins? Yes, there are gold coins, but in no way should they be considered junk. It's an expression. Should you buy a one-ounce gold coin? Personally, I wouldn't. You'd pay nearly $1300 or more for it and how would you break it into smaller denominations? You can't. It's best to buy what are called 1/10th ounce gold coins. Today's price gets you a 1/10th ounce Gold American Eagle coin for around $145.00. That's something you can use as barter because it's in a small enough denomination.

When it comes to buying gold and silver, it's difficult to lose. These are precious metals (not man-made) that will not only never lose value, but will only increase in value. Every home should not only have extra food items, water, toilet paper, and such (even a generator), but should also have a few thousand dollars' worth of silver and gold coins. Do not keep them in a bank! Might as well not have them if you're going to put them in a bank. Find or make a great hiding place in your home or on your property and hide them there.

Folks, it's important to think pragmatically for the coming days. If you were going on an extended camping trip, you would make a list of everything you need, then you would make sure you had it. If you were preparing for a hurricane to come through, you would do everything you could to protect your home and belongings. You would also get additional supplies in case the electricity goes out. This is just common sense.

If you're interested in purchasing gold or silver coins, do not do it over the Internet unless you use a fully reputable company. The best thing to do is find a local dealer but check him/her out thoroughly before you buy.

I was talking to one dealer who told me a good friend of his thought he found a deal on eBay for a silver bar. He bought it, it arrived and he brought it in to show the coin dealer. The coin dealer gold me that as soon as he picked it up he knew it was fake. The weight just wasn't there. He then scraped off a corner of...you guessed it...paint. It was a metal bar that had been beautifully painted and packaged in a beautiful display case.

In these times, there are plenty of people who are ready to take advantage of you. Do your homework. Do not buy gold certificates. While the paper may represent real gold, good luck obtaining the actual gold when the economy fails. Do not buy over the Internet except from very reputable dealers. Buy locally when/if you can. Buy junk silver or gold coins in small denominations.

If the economy never collapses, then simply pass the silver and gold coins onto relatives or children in your will. They'll appreciate it. But do make preparations. Don't forget other necessities you may need - food, water, toilet paper, a generator, gasoline, candles, batteries, etc. Plan for the worst and hope for the best and you'll never be wrong or taken by surprise.

(This article has been reblogged from For Truth's Sake!)

Is Obama Using Taqiyya or is He Just Painfully Incompetent?.....David R.

Islam is a religion that condones the use of lying and deception in order to accomplish its goals. The term is Taqiyya and it is found in the Muslim Holy book, the Quran. This principle of “lying for the advancement of Allah” allows Muslims to lie for any reason, in any place, at any time in order to advance the Islamic caliphate. It is using Taqiyya for their benefit.

There are a lot of images that come to mind when I think of President Barack Hussein Obama and strong, diligent leader is not one of them. Rather, a slithering, cowardly snake comes to mind who speaks with a forked tongue in an effort to mislead you from his real intentions. Is Obama using Taqiyya?

For years the man has been extremely successful in convincing the nation’s misguided liberals that he is for them, he is on their side, as he has continually advocated for the redistribution of wealth while virtually demonizing anyone who is financially successful. While at the same time he has, throughout his presidency, hosted $35,000 a plate banquets while the rest of the nation continues to suffer, and he has consistently implemented policies that actually enrich the people he suggests you should hate. Is Obama using Taqiyya?

This is because President Obama’s efforts to tax the rich only enable them to pass their costs down to the consumers; however, President Obama knows this because he was supposedly a college professor. No, actually he was just considered a “senior lecturer.” This is just another example of how Obama can twist facts to give a favorable impression of himself.

President Obama has also mastered the art of adopting the right persona for whatever audience he happens to be speaking before. Harry Reid once referred to Obama as “light skinned with no negro dialect.”  How he was able to do this without being called a racist is anyone’s guess; however, President Obama can surely adopt the “negro dialect” whenever speaking in front of a crowd of African Americans. The larger point here is that we can’t be sure of who Obama is because he is whoever he needs to be at the moment to accomplish his agenda. Could it be that Obama is using Taqiyya?

Unfortunately, in recent years the U.S. has seen its share of dishonest presidents who seem to be working in lock step with the globalist agenda, so it would be extremely unfair to simply suggest Barrack Obama is a liar. There seems to be a hovering darkness that surrounds the man and many are convinced through the president’s own words and actions, that he is a Muslim and has his heart set on transforming America into a Muslim nation. What were these words and actions? Here are a few examples.

• Obama said in 2007,  that the Muslim call to prayer is one of the prettiest sounds on Earth
• Obama appoints Muslim Brotherhood officials to key administration positions
• Obama has been arming radical Muslims, including those currently taking over Iraq
• Also see this article by Alex Newman of the New American
• Obama DOJ assures U.S. Muslims they have special protection
• Obama tells NASA their new mission is “Muslim Outreach”
• Obama credits Islam as “building the very fabric of our nation.”
• Obama Department of Homeland Security advisor asserts America is an Islamic country
• Obama designates August as Muslim appreciation month

These are a few reasons why nearly forty seven percent of the population are convinced that Barrack Hussein Obama is a Muslim.

Many people, because of their indoctrination into multiculturalism, don’t feel that having a Muslim as president would be bad. In fact, these people are likely to call you a racist or an Islamophobic for fearing such a thing. This is of course based on their misguided belief that all cultures are morally equivalent (except for ours) and that all people essentially hold the same values of caring for their fellow man. This is often times referred to as moral relativism, and this foolish belief is ruining the country.

People who believe that Islam is morally equivalent with Christianity and the values of the west are the proverbial useful idiots of our time. This is because when it comes to the issue of wanting to be fair and “non-offensive,” people will often times ignore facts in favor of emotions that make them feel good.

The point I am trying to make here is that Islam is a religion that condones the use of lying and deception in order to accomplish its goals. Using Taqiyya is found in the Muslim Holy book, the Quran. This principle of “lying for the advancement of Allah” allows Muslims to lie for any reason, in any place, at any time in order to advance the Islamic caliphate. It is essentially the same as the left’s principle of “the ends justify the means.” This is probably why the left and Islam seem to have an unbreakable bond, because they are both willing to lie and sell their souls in order to accomplish an agenda. I would argue however, that the left has no real religious convictions, while Islam does. Once again, is Obama using Taqiyya?

President Obama has continually tried to convince the nation that he is a practicing Christian, while simultaneously advancing the Islamic objective through the actions listed above. An authentic Christian would not do this.

If Barack Obama was truly a practicing Christian  there is no way he would have allowed thepersecution of Christians, at the hands of Islamic radicals, to go on as long as it has, but as we know, actions speak far louder than words.

What we are witnessing in Iraq is nothing but the beginning of another holocaust targeting Christians; thousands have been brutally murdered and tens of thousands have fled. ISIS (Islamic State Iraq and Syria) militants have given remaining Christians the option of converting to Islam or face beheading.  Thousand of Iraqi Christians who have fled their homes now sit in fear in the mountains with no place else to go as ISIS militants continue to hunt them down. It has been reported that people are throwing their own children off the mountain to spare them the torture awaiting them at the hands of ISIS.

Finally on August 8, President Obama authorized limited airstrikes against these radicals in order to, not save the Christians fleeing their cities, but to protect American diplomats that are in the city of Ebril. If Barack Obama was concerned about helping the Christians in the Middle East he wouldn’t have armed the Islamic factions  hell bent on their destruction for any reason. The Islamic militants in Iraq are the same groups of terrorists The United States has armedto oust Syrian leader Bashar al-Asaad, and it was argued that arming these rebels would ensure a more stable Syria.

This means either one of two things, Barack Obama is a blithering idiot who has no idea how to engage in foreign policy. One of those far left pacifists that believe an America that does lessto keep the world safe will keep the keep the world safer. The remaining option is just as terrifying as having such an incompetent in the White House and that is, he knows exactly what he is doing and is aiding the enemy in their efforts to Islamicize America. After all, we already have Muslim Brotherhood operatives running the Department of Homeland security while ISIS is also claiming that their flag will be raised over the White House. Either way, something needs to be done because all he is doing is endangering and weakening us as a nation.

Truthfully, and this is something that Fred and I discussed on our upcoming “Truth Trends” radio show, the American people have the constitutional power and authority to stop any of this from happening. If Americans would take the time to educate themselves on the Constitution and stop listening to the rantings of a professional rabble rouser, they would realize that with illegitimate power, comes illegitimate laws,  and because Barack Obama has done all he can to subvert the Constitution and the rule of legitimately passed laws, everything he does has no constitutional authority. He only has the power we allow him to have folks.

 This article was reblogged from www.fortruthssake.com

Communism, White Privilege and the coming American Genocide.......David R

I believe our nation is in a great deal of trouble; in fact, I don’t think I’m going too far in saying that we are on the precipice of  once again, repeating history . Not only can you compare America’s current state of affairs to the fall of Rome, I believe we are on the verge of yet another government sponsored genocide in our nation. Though, the correct term for the government sponsored murder of its own citizens is democide. Governments are actually responsible for the senseless deaths of millions upon millions of people; in fact, governments, in time of peace, have murdered more people than the combined deaths of all of mans wars in history. This is especially true of the twentieth century with the rise of communism. Over one hundred million people were brutally murdered by communist regimes in search of Utopia between 1900 and 2000. From Lenin and Stalin to Mao Tse Tsung, to Pol Pot in Cambodia and the Brutal Regime of North Korea, the quest to create a perfect society where people accept total state domination has been nothing but bloody.

The reason for this is simple, communism is a system that demands total and complete obedience to the state, and anyone who opposes is standing in the way of progress and needs to be eliminated. Bringing society to the point where they will willingly participate in the slaughter of their own countrymen is not an overnight process, it is a gradual conditioning of the population to get them to believe that some people are not as worthy of life as others.

I believe that here in the United States we are witnessing this gradual process unfold before our very eyes. Gregory H. Stanton has identified an eight stage process that generally occurs in the conditioning of a people to prepare them for genocide.  In this article I intend to give a brief analysis of each of the eight steps (if applicable because we have not completed all of them) and how they apply to the situation we currently face in the United States.

The first step is classification. This simply means classifying people into different groups and intentionally dividing people along ideological lines. Once this is accomplished stark contrasts can be made between different cultural groups, and these differences can be used to cite hatred and create discontent. The job of community organizers is essential here because one group of people will be convinced they are being oppressed by another. In the United States we no longer have an “American,” who understands their nations values and the virtues of liberty. We have the proverbial “hyphenated American” who instead of being taught the benefits of assimilating  into American culture, are actually being encouraged through  “Multiculturalism” to retain their own . This does little more than ensure Americas vast population has no common virtue in which they can unite. The best way to explain this is simply saying, “United we stand, divided we fall.”

The next stage is known as “symbolization.” This is the process of attaching a negative symbol to the  dominating ideology of the targeted group. While many may argue that the communist and fascist regimes of the twentieth century went as far as forcing different groups to wear different symbols for identification, and in America we don’t that, it is just as effective to create “mental associations.” This simply means attaching an idea or a belief to the targeted group. In the United States today, right wing Americans have been classified as potential terrorists because of their willingness to defend their rights. White males have been classified as being “automatically racist simply for being white” through the White Privilege ideology. These ideas are meant to work on the collective level and once they are seated they are nearly impossible to alter. This is especially true when aided by the rabble rousings of a community organizer whose job is specifically targeted at creating discontent.

The next stage is known as “dehumanization.” I personally can’t think of anything more dehumanizing than being assumed to be a racist simply because I am white. By teaching students that white men are privileged and racist, our universities are dehumanizing nearly every white male in the country, at least in the eyes of the minorities that whites allegedly oppress. This is why we are constantly being called a racist for opposing anything proposed by the left. In an effort to get the world to see us as being uncompassionate and mean spirited, they are actually paving the way for the acceptance of our extermination. Think about the narrative concerning the border. Obama brought children to the border specifically to dehumanize any opposition to his amnesty agenda. The same holds true for Christians as well because they stand in the way of the states utopia, therefore they must be discredited and dehumanized in order for them to no longer pose a threat. Christians overseas are already facing extermination at the hands of the Islamofascists.

The next stage is “organization” The political left is the master of organization, Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals is the organizing bible for the left, and they have mastered the art of teaching minorities that they are oppressed by Americas evil white men. They have the schools, the government agencies, the non profit organizations and the message that America’s rich white men are intentionally keeping them down for their own financial gain is constant and relentless. We saw in 2010 the formation of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement and the lengths they are willing to go to make a point. This is a testament to how well the left can organize a political movement. These folks are Lenin’s useful idiots and they should not be underestimated. They would likely follow any charismatic leader on a genocidal march across the landscape if they believed it would bring about the utopian promised land.

The next stage is “polarization.” Stanton identifies this as the downward spiral of killings until the vortex of all out genocide is reached. There is little doubt that the white man in America is being polarized as over the past couple of years we have seen a drastic rise in black on white violence. Colin Flaherty, in his book “White Girl Bleed A lot” has done unprecedented work in reporting the mass wave of black mob violence against whites. This violence is actually the result of the “dehumanization” stage of the genocide process. Black people have been so conditioned to believe that the white man is intentionally keeping him down that violence has become the accepted and justified solution. They are also being aided by a race baiting president and an attorney general who has signaled that they will not be charged with hate crimes for committing such violence. It must be noted that these people are again, the proverbial useful idiots being used to carry out a political agenda. When it is accomplished they too will be targeted.

This brings us to the final three stages which are preparation, extermination and denial. I stopped with polarization because I believe that is the stage we are currently in. Though, it could be argued that we are in the preparation stage as it has been reported that all Americans must be microchipped by 2017 per Obamacare regulations, or even the call for a universal I.D. can be used to justify the idea that we are in the preparation stage. After that it is all over. The justified slaughter of millions takes place and no one questions it because they have been psychologically conditioned to accept it because the targeted population has been reduced to nothing but a burden on society. The genocide is often times carried out with the belief that they are doing something for the betterment of mankind. In the end its nothing but the senseless murder of millions. Then, when it is all done it is denied. To this day there are many people who view the Old Soviet Block as a paradise on Earth and refuse to believe that Lenin and Stalin combined, murdered nearly 60 million of their own countrymen. This is done through the skillful use of propaganda and the ridiculing of those who tell the truth.

Whether or not this happens in America, it is entirely up to us my friends.

This article was reblogged from www.fortruthssake.com

Enough with Claims of Racism by Leftists and Emotional Virtue!

Nearly every day, we hear of some idiot who says something should be changed or removed due to its implicit racism. The claims of racism continue nearly unabated. It's annoying and unrealistic. To hear the left tell it, anything that smacks of even a smidgen of racism should not be given any attention in society except the attention that seeks to remove it from public sight.

The latest case has to do with a NAACP chapter in Florida whose president of that local chapter is now demanding that a portrait of Gen. Robert E. Lee is racist. Because of this, "James Muwakkil, President of the Lee County, FL chapter of the NAACP, has petitioned the local commission to remove a portrait of General Robert E. Lee from their chambers."

What is even more interesting is that Lee County itself was named after Gen. Robert E. Lee, but first things first. Muwakkil says, "That painting is a symbol of racism...It’s a symbol of divisiveness, and it doesn’t unify Lee County. It divides Lee County."

Actually, in my view, a portrait of President Obama is far more divisive to this country than a portrait of a 3-star general. But maybe we should do some research on Gen. Lee before we decide to agree with Muwakkil's disproving attitude toward him.

There are numerous quotes and letters attributed to Gen. Lee in which he was, at first, completely in favor of slavery as an institution. After the Civil War, it also appears as though this attitude changed so that he became opposed to it. Then again, when Lee defended slavery as an institution, he also noted that (he believed) blacks were far better off in America than in Africa where tribal warfare often left many either slaves or dead by other tribes. Apparently, he may have even run an illegal school on his property for his slaves.

Certainly, all of this is up for debate and because of community organizers today, who (as David Risselada has already stated) use their position to inflict "hateful sermons designed specifically to rally the uninformed to a certain cause." In another article, Risselada states, "The very purpose of community organizing is to rally people around these concepts of oppression and unfairness and we all know Barack Obama began his career as a community organizer."

Community organizers (and I consider the NAACP to be part of that category) does its job by keeping people in the throes of discontent and then providing a target for that growing resentment. All too often, for the black community, community organizers turn the attention of those blacks against whites, telling them that America is so deeply entrenched in racism by whites, that it will never change unless and until a revolution occurs. Because of this system that exists, blacks are also taught that it is impossible for them to be racist (thanks to people like Dr. Derek Bell and others who pushed the Critical Race Theory of the 1970s). If they're not racist (because they do not have the alleged power that whites do), then when they commit crimes against white people, those crimes are not automatically charged as hate crimes. In fact, rarely are they so charged. Yet, if/when a white person attacks a black, it is - without question - charged as a hate crime.

But getting back to Muwakkil's expressed opinion about Gen. Lee, whose portrait he believes to be a divisive symbol of racism, one can only wonder what's next? Would the left like to rewrite and redact history until the only statues or portraits that appear are those of leftwing whites and blacks?

The same thing happened in Atlanta, GA not long ago when local NAACP chapters demanded the removal of a senator from the past - Thomas Watson - who was recognized as being racist. But with ever-changing mores these days, one wonders what actually constitutes racism today? So many definitions have changed due to emotional virtue and the work of community organizers that everyone is simply on edge.

But let's say that Muwakkil is correct and because of the potential division that the continued presence of the portrait might cause, it's best to remove it. Okay, but here is another question that I think trumps Muwakkil's concern over an old painting of Gen. Lee that most people likely don't even notice anymore because it's been there so long.

Here's the question: why is the leader of a local chapter of the NAACP so concerned about a painting that could offend a few blacks and other leftist, but has nothing to say about the FACT that the influx of illegal aliens into this country will be further devastating to black communities throughout America?

Blacks are already among the hardest hit under President Obama due to his economic policies (such as they are). It is very clear that Barack Obama is far more concerned about stressing America's economic system to the point of overload and adding more democrats to the voting roles than in doing anything at all to help the very high unemployment numbers among blacks. President Obama's polices have done nothing to help the black community. In fact, it appears that he has simply continued the polices originally put in place by President Lyndon B. Johnson who swore to have black folks voting democrat for two hundred years and that has been done through Welfare and other entitlements. Of course, do we ever hear the left referring to Johnson as a racist even though he is known to have used the "N" word to describe blacks?

It became the NEW slavery system but too many like Muwakkil can't see that at all. They are secure in their own personal position as a local chapter president of NAACP, just like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are secure in their positions. These people do not want to help anyone at all, much less blacks. They simply want to line their own pockets and make a name for themselves all the while making others believe that their main concern is for other black folks.

The fact that too many black leaders are concerned with issues such as the one surrounding a portrait of Gen. Lee hanging in some building in Florida and are not concerned for black communities and upward mobility tells me that their scruples are in the wrong place.

Rallying against racism is certainly a good thing where and when it actually exists, but too often it is a one-way street and focused on minutiae. The problem that seems to exist in too many black communities (and with too many black leaders) is that racism is all they seem to care about. While they're chasing it 

underground or removing public symbols of racism, they have not changed one thing for blacks. In fact, they continue to do everything they can to keep blacks dependent upon the federal government.

(This article has been reblogged from For Truth's Sake!)